So many injustices, because no one asked Dr. Henry Kissinger to set a leg

We are in the world of Dr. Doom, Doc Octopus, and Doctor Strange, as Trumpian ignorance has yet to recede from not recognizing the differences among honorific, honorary, and honor.

The WSJ publishes an opinion piece suggesting Dr. Jill Biden stop using the ‘Dr.’ title
The Wall Street Journal published an opinion piece by writer and essayist Joseph Epstein on Saturday, in which he called the First Lady-elect Dr. Jill Biden “kiddo” and urged her to stop using the “Dr.” title in front of her name. Dr. Jill Biden has a doctoral degree from the University of Delaware.

A man who does not have a PhD says Dr. Jill Biden is “fraudulent” and “comic” to use her title because her doctorate isn’t in medicine.

https://twitter.com/kazweida/status/1337809383778992135?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

After leaving government service, he founded Kissinger Associates, an international consulting firm, of which he is chairman. Dr. Kissinger was born in Fuerth, Germany, on May 27, 1923, came to the United States in 1938, and was naturalised a United States citizen on June 19, 1943.

Beatrix “The Bride” Kiddo (codename: Black Mamba) is a fictional character and the protagonist of the two-part movie Kill Bill directed by Quentin Tarantino. She is portrayed by Uma Thurman.

In Bizarro world, Trump might say: “We won in the Supreme Moot Court”. Lost cause and last wall, searching for a Writ of Mandimwit.

Wow! Thousands of people forming in Washington (D.C.) for Stop the Steal. Didn’t know about this, but I’ll be seeing them! #MAGA— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020

Melissa Carone is speaking at the Rally for President Trump but she’s not saying much of anything pic.twitter.com/VQe2j8q2es — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 12, 2020

“destroy the GOP” … BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

At least 86 (!) judges from across the country, whose beliefs span the ideological spectrum, have rejected Trump’s baseless fraud claims and upheld the judiciary’s commitment to reason and law.

@PostRoz⁩ and ⁦@eliseviebeck⁩ on “The Last Wall” https://t.co/WzePHRcwG6 — Philip Rucker (@PhilipRucker) December 12, 2020

In a remarkable show of near-unanimity across the nation’s judiciary, at least 86 judges — ranging from jurists serving at the lowest levels of state court systems to members of the United States Supreme Court — rejected at least one post-election lawsuit filed by Trump or his supporters, a Washington Post review of court filings found.
The string of losses was punctuated Friday by the brief and blunt order of the Supreme Court, which dismissed an attempt by the state of Texas to thwart the electoral votes of four states that went for President-elect Joe Biden.
Taken together, the judges’s decisions — some short and to the point and others sweeping defenses of American democracy — have comprehensively dismantled the arguments advanced by Trump in his effort to get the courts to subvert Biden’s victory.
In an era when so many institutions of American life have bowed to partisan tribalism, the dozens of opinions serve as a resounding reaffirmation of the judiciary’s nonpartisan commitment to basic principles of reason, fact and law.
“Voters, not lawyers, choose the President,” declared U.S. Circuit Court Judge Stephanos Bibas, a former prosecutor and law professor appointed in 2017 by Trump, as he rejected an attempt to throw out Pennsylvania’s votes for Biden.www.washingtonpost.com/…

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments