“Like the venerable Sen. Clay Davis, the President may simply walk away with their money and give nothing in return. Sheeeeit.”
Ã¢ÂÂ Thomas Ursinus (@thomas_ursinus) December 17, 2018
Me to my 7yo: It is with mere subjective hope that this cookie I offer to you for cleaning your room will transform into future positive behavior that benefits my derivative parental interests
Ã¢ÂÂ Paul Cutler (@PCutlerUT) December 17, 2018
One does not drop $150,000 for Ã¢ÂÂmere subjective hopeÃ¢ÂÂ
Ã¢ÂÂ Truth Hertz (@umussbekidding) December 17, 2018
See…itÃ¢ÂÂs not a bribe if we just say itÃ¢ÂÂs not a bribe. pic.twitter.com/cPRgVxRrAl
Ã¢ÂÂ B (@j_beeezy) December 17, 2018
Willie Tango Foxtrot
Ã¢ÂÂ Ginger Threat Object Claus McSillyPants (@Caam91) December 17, 2018
Basically just because someone tries to bribe POTUS by spending money at his establishments doesn't mean he has to give them what they want nor does it mean he can't profit of said attempt…wow…
Ã¢ÂÂ Wearetalent (@Wearetalent1) December 17, 2018
Forestalling that “hope” is the exact purpose of the Emoluments Clause.
Any lawyers over there?