Why is insincere/tactical/strategic voting considered undesirable?

Avatar of The Politicus
The Politicus
Jan 01, 2013 11:28 AM 0 Answers
Member Since Sep 2018
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe

In most of scholarly discussions about voting systems, the implication seems to be that one of the desired goals is to minimize/eliminate insincere/tactical/strategic voting:

Tactical voting is commonly regarded as a problem, since it makes the actual ballot into a nontrivial game, where voters react and counter-react to what they expect other voters' strategies to be.

Is there an actual scholarly or political science research showing that efficacy of tactical voting is an undesirable property of a voting system aside from "well, it makes voting more complicated and if you don't do it right you may accidentally end up with worse electeds"?

Nobody is forced to use tactical voting strategies, so if you use one incorrectly (as opposed to sincerely voting your preferences), it should be your problem, not the voting system's.

0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
Please login to submit answer.
0 Answers
Sort By:

  • January 1, 2013