Why did the EU give stronger “protections” to minors in the GDPR, considering that COPPA has had the effect of restricting those it tries to protect?

0
Avatar of The Politicus
The Politicus
Sep 29, 2022 03:54 AM 1 Answers
Member Since Sep 2018
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

Quite a few years ago, the US passed COPPA, which imposes quite strict regulations on sites that collect information from children under 13. The end result was that many sites banned users under 13 years old. This isn't really that big of a problem; it could be argued that there are few sites not specifically designed for children that children this age have any reason to use.

When the European Union passed the GDPR, they included a provision that children cannot consent to data collection, and allowed member states to set the age of consent anywhere from 13 to 16. At least some picked 16. Why? Did they not expect the same thing that happened to children under 13 in the US with COPPA to happen to children and teens under 16 in the EU? The argument that most sites not specifically targeting children are not relevant to them is much weaker when "children" are defined as anyone under 16 rather than 13.

Did they somehow not expect this to happen, or did they determine that protecting the privacy of teens 13 to 15 is more important than their ability to use the Internet with few limitations?

0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
Please login to submit answer.
1 Answers
Sort By:
Best Answer
0
076ed61bde732ffa218ede4aaa7f81b1?s=96&r=g
Political Minded
Sep 30, 2022
Flag(0)

The various EU members have slightly different national laws. Looking at , you will find different age limits

  • for buying a donut, a beer, or a vodka,
  • for buying something with immediate payment or in installments,
  • for driving a motor scooter, a car, or a heavy motorcycle,
  • for voting in municipal or federal elections (some states),
  • for being liable for damages and being guilty of a crime.

While people can and do quibble about the exact placement of any one limit, the clear pattern is that younger children are more protected from decisions with grave consequences, or with abstract consequences. A minor may be allowed to buy something for €30, but not in 12 "easy" installments of €2.50 each.

The consequences of privacy loss can be abstract, until they happen.

Sign in to Reply
Replying as Submit

  • September 29, 2022