What political apparatus and rules allow the United States to have leverage against companies when it has several intellectual properties associated?

0
The Politicus
Jul 15, 2022 12:37 AM 0 Answers
Member Since Sep 2018
Subscribed Subscribe Not subscribe
Flag(0)

What political apparatus and rules allow the United States to have leverage against companies when it has several intellectual properties associated?

Only the Dutch manufacturer ASML makes the lithography machines that
use the short wavelengths at the extreme end of the ultraviolet
spectrum to shrink transistors to such tiny dimensions. And the
fabrication plants are extremely expensive, costing up to US$20
billion each.

In 2020, the US forced the Dutch government to ban exports of ASML’s
most sophisticated lithography machines to China. ASML uses American
intellectual property, giving Washington leverage.

https://asiatimes.com/2022/07/how-china-could-leapfrog-us-chip-making-bans/

It says it's because of the intellectual property that ASML has political leverage over ASML.

And afterwards it says that ASML doesn't have to listen to the U.S. regarding product that doesn't use enough of American intellectual properties:

As Scott Foster and Jeff Pao reported in Asia Times, Washington last
month asked the Dutch government to stop ASML from selling the older
DUV machines to China as well.

Semiconductor Industry executives told Asia Times that the Dutch would
not accede to the American demand. ASML’s China sales exceeded $2.7
billion in 2021, including the 81 DUV lithography machines.

The American intellectual property (IP) content of the older machines
isn’t big enough to justify an American ban, analysts and executives
say.

Through what laws and organisms can the United States use its intellectual properties to force companies to abide by its will? I am thinking the United States Patent and Trademark Office can do something against ASML, but since ASML doesn't infringe on anyone's patent by exporting goods, I am not sure what laws allow the United States to exercise such influence and only when a lot of American intellectual properties are involved.

0 Subscribers
Submit Answer
Please login to submit answer.
0 Answers
Sort By: