Press "Enter" to skip to content

NYT: Hope Hicks faces 'existential question' over subpoena; AOC, et al., ain't havin' it

I mean, come on. Look how pretty she is! A doe-eyed, unblemished ingenue who couldn’t possibly have done anything wrong because … well, look at that dress! Snow white! And she looks so graceful. Like Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis lightly sprinkled in Cheeto dust.

Why would the House ever subpoena such an angel? Unless they want to ask her which hypoallergenic leave-in conditioner works best in St. Barts or something.

Hey, The New York Times is apparently wondering the same thing.

Um, okay. You know, in ordinary times, congressional subpoenas aren’t like invitations to timeshare seminars. They’re not really optional, unless your ex-boss is a wannabe tyrant.

Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought.

Is Trump still singeing your sphincter? Dear F*cking Lunatic: 101 Obscenely Rude Letters to Donald Trump and its breathlessly awaited sequel Dear F*cking Moron: 101 More Letters to Donald Trump by Aldous J. Pennyfarthing are the salve you need! Reviewers have called these books “hysterically funny,” “cathartic,” and “laugh-out-loud” comic relief. And you can get them for less than the price of a cup of coffee … or a black-market Xanax … or five minutes of therapy. It’s time to heal, my friends. Buy now!

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Politicus is a collaborative political community that facilitates content creation directly on the site. Our goal is to make the political conversation accessible to everyone.

Any donations we receive will go into writer outreach. That could be advertising on Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit or person-to-person outreach on College campuses. Please help if you can:

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x