The Politicus

Create | Share | Influence

BREAKING: Senate Votes 55-45 (Truly Last Update – Dems Got the Testimony they Wanted)

3 min read

Response to all the comments below that the Dems “caved”:

The House managers really only wanted one witness: Herrera-Beutler, who could testify what Trump told McCarthy — VERY damaging testimony. Herrera-Beutler’s report on that was entered into the record and Trump’s lawyers stipulated to it. That’s what they wanted and that’s what they got.

Anything else was actually risky. You can never be sure what a witness will say when they get on the stand, particularly when there has been no time to vet them, no time to prepare, and especially in a case like where there will be huge pressure brought to bear to threaten them (Greene already did), to get them to lie or to recant or to fudge. This way, they got a statement that said just what they wanted to hear, and they got it without challenge.


The WaPo is reporting that the Senate will call wtinesses:

The Senate voted Saturday to call witnesses in Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, in a surprise move that comes one day after a Republican congresswoman’s account of the former president’s actions on Jan. 6 received national attention.
Lead impeachment manager Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said Saturday that he wanted to subpoena Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.).

Beutler will be able to confirm that call from McCarthy to Trump where Trump made it explicit that he was on the side of the insurrection and wouldn’t do anything to stop it.

In her statement Friday night, Beutler said that when McCarthy “finally reached the president on Jan. 6 and asked him to publicly and forcefully call off the riot, the president initially repeated the falsehood that it was antifa that had breached the Capitol.”
“McCarthy refuted that and told the president that these were Trump supporters. That’s when, according to McCarthy, the president said, ‘Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are,’” Beutler said.

It seems the House managers initially decided against calling witnesses. If they changed their mind, it would partly be because of Beutler’s statement last night.

“Last night this was breaking news,” Raskin said.

Now here is an interesting twist:

Five Republicans joined Democrats in voting in favor: Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Ben Sasse (Neb.) and Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.), who initially voted “no” but later switched to “yes.”

Graham had previously warned against calling witnesses, saying the defense would call plenty of their own and it would be embarrassing.

Graham focused on the idea that Trump’s defense would then call witnesses that could reinforce that certain elements of the Capitol siege planned and coordinated the attack beforehand.
“There’s mounting evidence that the people came to Washington preplanned the attack before the president ever spoke,” Graham said. He added: “If you open up that can of worms, we’ll want the FBI to come in and tell us about how people preplanned this attack and what happened with the security footprint of the Capitol. You open up Pandora’s box if you call one witness.”

Graham’s line of argument strikes me as wishful thinking, given that the FBI is accumulating more and more evidence that Trump was involved in the planning. If he thinks the FBI will indict Antifa, he is even more deluded than usual (which is saying something).

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Politicus is a collaborative political community that facilitates content creation directly on the site. Our goal is to make the political conversation accessible to everyone.

Any donations we receive will go into writer outreach. That could be advertising on Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit or person-to-person outreach on College campuses. Please help if you can:

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x