The Politicus

Create | Share | Influence

96% of Iowa caucus results has Buttigieg ahead of Sanders by 0.3% in state delegate equivalents

3 min read

IDP Caucus 2020 Results 96% reporting (1686 of 1765 precincts)

Candidate SDE National Delegates
Bennet 0
Biden 327.578
Bloomberg 0.21
Buttigieg 549.074
Delaney 0
Gabbard 0.114
Klobuchar 253.854
Patrick 0
Sanders 533.105
Steyer 6.505
Warren 380.045
Yang 21.368
Other 0.693
Uncommitted 3.957

There were some reporting issues that seem to have been corrected, but there’s disinformation aplenty that should not get re-amplified.

x

IDP Caucus 2020 Results
92% reporting (1624 of 1765 precincts)

results.thecaucuses.org

Candidate SDE National Delegates
Bennet 0
Biden 318.588
Bloomberg 0.21
Buttigieg 531.72
Delaney 0
Gabbard 0.114
Klobuchar 242.888
Patrick 0
Sanders 513.096
Steyer 6.09
Warren 365.653
Yang 20.838
Other 0.693
Uncommitted 3.732

x

x

x

This is odd.

x

interesting site: elections.ap.org/…

x

Thursday, Feb 6, 2020 · 2:21:07 AM +00:00 · annieli

x

A glitch in the smartphone app used to count and report votes from individual precincts continues to delay results from Monday’s Iowa caucuses. But a closer look shows that the app had a potentially graver problem that apparently did not come into play: its vulnerability to hacking.

The IowaReporterApp was so insecure that vote totals, passwords and other sensitive information could have been intercepted or even changed, according to officials at Massachusetts-based Veracode, a security firm that reviewed the software at ProPublica’s request. Because of a lack of safeguards, transmissions to and from the phone were left largely unprotected.

[…]

The app was plagued with data-reporting problems and curious error messages, according to screenshots published by Motherboard, which was first able to download and install a copy of the app this week. The app’s failure prevented some precinct workers from transmitting local election results to the state’s Democratic Party. Because there wasn’t enough backup staffing, officials encountered long delays to phone in tallies. Some still have not been posted.

[…]

ProPublica obtained a version of the app from an Iowa precinct chair and sent it to Veracode for review this week. ProPublica is not publishing the specific problems with the app to avoid giving a detailed blueprint to hackers, should a similar version of the software be used again.

“This is an extremely serious vulnerability,” said J. Alex Halderman, a University of Michigan computer science professor and chief scientist at the security firm Censys. “An adversary could exploit it to intercept and change caucus results as they were being submitted through the app. Such a change would probably be caught eventually, if officials carefully compared paper return sheets from each location to the computerized results, but it still would have cast doubt on the whole process in peoples’ minds.”

www.propublica.org/…

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Politicus is a collaborative political community that facilitates content creation directly on the site. Our goal is to make the political conversation accessible to everyone.

Any donations we receive will go into writer outreach. That could be advertising on Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit or person-to-person outreach on College campuses. Please help if you can:

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x